阿根廷vs墨西哥竞猜
 library logo
    • login
    view item 
    •   knowledge commons home
    • electronic theses and dissertations
    • undergraduate theses
    • view item
    •   knowledge commons home
    • electronic theses and dissertations
    • undergraduate theses
    • view item
    javascript is disabled for your browser. some features of this site may not work without it.
    quick search

    browse

    all of knowledge commonscommunities & collectionsby issue dateauthorstitlessubjectsdisciplineadvisorcommittee memberthis collectionby issue dateauthorstitlessubjectsdisciplineadvisorcommittee member

    my account

    login

    comparing chinese returning farmlands to forest project to canadian nature forest restoration projects

    thumbnail
    view/open
    liz2020b-1a.pdf (635.0kb)
    date
    2020
    author
    li, zhiyuan
    metadata
    show full item record
    abstract
    this thesis compares the biggest human forest restoration project, return farmland to forest project (rffp), in china to natural forest restoration (nfrp) in canada. these two countries have the third and second largest territory in the world respectively. however, the forest coverage rate in canada is much larger than china. due to this situation, chinese government and canadian government have different forest restoration policies and projects. both rffp in china and natural forest restoration projects in canada are led by the governments. they were based on a voluntary scheme which make people aware of the benefits. they are both led to an improvement in the environment. there is a huge difference in government funding between rffp and nfrp. based on historical forest cover area, the forest strategies are different which rffp is focusing on increasing forest cover area and nfrp is focused on keeping forests sustainable.
    uri
    http://knowledgecommons.lakeheadu.ca/handle/2453/4607
    collections
    • undergraduate theses [325]

    阿根廷vs墨西哥竞猜 library
    contact us | send feedback

     

     


    阿根廷vs墨西哥竞猜 library
    contact us | send feedback